It hasn’t been easy keeping up with the twists and turns that Microsoft’s client-side frameworks and libraries have taken in the past couple years. Even today, I still hear from a surprising number of developers that don’t realize the ASP.NET Ajax Library is dead.

With that in mind, I’ve been writing an article on and off for the past several months that attempts to disambiguate Microsoft’s various client-side initiatives and hopefully provide some clarity. When Karsten from Mix Online contacted me about writing another article for them, we decided that this would be a perfect follow up to the jQuery article I wrote for them last year.

Here’s the first few paragraphs:

When Microsoft announced they would begin providing official support for jQuery, few of us realized how profoundly that announcement would eventually impact client-side development on the ASP.NET platform. Since that announcement, using jQuery with ASP.NET has moved from the obscure, to a central role in ASP.NET MVC’s client-side story, and now to the point of potentially superseding ASP.NET AJAX itself.

The journey hasn’t been all smooth. With Microsoft’s move toward jQuery, the ASP.NET AJAX, Microsoft Ajax Library, ASP.NET Ajax Library and Ajax Control Toolkit roadmaps have been uncertain at times. This has made it difficult to keep track of which projects are still relevant, and especially which you should choose going forward.

In my last article for Mix Online, I discussed what ASP.NET needed to know about jQuery from development perspective. In this article, I want to provide clarity on the events that led us to this point, talk about what portions of the current AJAX framework are and aren’t affected by recent changes and show you where we’re headed next. In addition, I’ll dive into the implications of the recent announcement about the adoption of Microsoft’s template library by the jQuery core.

Click here to read the rest of this article at Mix Online

For several years now, I have been consistently impressed with how Microsoft’s developer division gathers feedback and proactively responds. Nearly every time that I’ve participated in a survey or otherwise provided feedback (solicited or not), someone has followed up with me about my specific concerns. In my experience with how other large companies gather feedback, that’s not common.

So, when I answered a recent survey about ASP.NET development in Visual Studio 2010, I wasn’t surprised when I received a follow-up email from a friendly fellow at Microsoft named Xinyang. In the optional comments section, I had mentioned my concern that CSS and JavaScript editing are becoming second class citizens in Visual Studio. In response, Xinyang asked me to provide more detail on that comment.

As I composed a lengthy email reply to him, it occurred to me that a post here would be a much more effective way to refine my feedback and potentially gather more responses from you at the same time.

So, here are a few of my ideas for improving client-side development in Visual Studio 2010, separated into CSS and JavaScript specific feedback. Xinyang and some of his colleagues will be reading this and your comments, so if you agree, disagree, or have other ideas yourself, be sure to chime in.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

Developing iPhone-optimized portions of an ASP.NET website presents a challenge. More specifically, it’s testing your creations that can be difficult.

Apple’s iPhone emulator only runs on Macs and the Windows-based alternatives don’t emulate mobile Safari well. That leaves us using an actual device as the only high-fidelity option for testing. That’s not all bad; especially when it comes to a touch-driven interface, testing with the real thing is preferable.

Unfortunately, the ASP.NET Development Server bundled with Visual Studio is severely restricted when it comes to testing externally. In fact, it could hardly be more restrictive – it refuses all external connections, even if those connections originate from the same local subnet.

In this post, I’m going to show you one way I’ve found to circumvent that restriction, how to configure your iPhone to take advantage of that, and how to connect to the development server once those steps are completed.

Note: This post specifically describes configuring an iPhone, but the same approach will work for any mobile device that supports using an HTTP proxy.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

One group of searches that consistently brings traffic here is variations on the error: Invalid JSON primitive. Unfortunately, the post that Google sends that traffic to doesn’t address the issue until somewhere within its 150+ comments.

Today, the topic gets its own post.

If you’ve worked with ASMX ScriptServices or Page Methods without ASP.NET AJAX’s client-side proxy (e.g. using jQuery or pure XMLHttpRequest code), you’ve may have seen this cryptic error yourself. Or, perhaps you’ve just arrived here due to seeing it for the first time.

Either way, you may be surprised to learn that the most common reason for this error is that you’ve lied to ASP.NET during your AJAX request.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

Continuing my series of posts about ASMX services and JSON, in this post I’m going to cover two common mistakes that plague the process of getting a project’s first ASMX ScriptService working: Installing System.Web.Extensions into the GAC and configuring your web.config.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

While we were recording episode 5 of Mastering jQuery, I found myself running down a lengthy list of misconceptions and potential pitfalls when it comes to using ASMX services for AJAX callbacks. After years of fielding questions revolving around that topic, I suppose I’ve developed a decent handle on the issues most often encountered.

To preemptively surface some of that commonly requested information, I’m going to publish a series of relatively short posts, each describing one mistake or misconception that I’ve seen come up frequently.

To get started, I want to cover one of the most fundamental of these misconceptions: That ASMX services can’t return JSON.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

If you’ve already begun using Microsoft’s new Ajax Script Loader with a CDN-hosted version of jQuery, today’s release of jQuery 1.4 may have left you wondering how to upgrade. Personally, I didn’t want to wait on a new version of Start.js, nor did I want to abandon the script loader now that I’ve become accustomed to its benefits.

No doubt, an upcoming ASP.NET Ajax Library iteration will update Start.js’ jQuery definition to reference jQuery 1.4.x. Regardless, knowing how to patch the script loader on your own terms is something that will be of recurring usefulness.

Luckily, the script loader is open and extensible enough that it’s possible to change which script versions are used. So, I want to briefly show you how the script loader defines JavaScript includes and how you can patch those definitions without modifying Start.js itself.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

If you haven’t been following the progress of Rob Conery and James Avery’s new venture, TekPub, you’ve been missing out on some great instructional videos. I especially like that they trend slightly Alt.NET, giving you more balanced information than is sometimes available from “official” .NET screencasts.

For the past few weeks, I’ve been working with James to record a series of episodes for TekPub myself: Mastering jQuery.

Mastering jQuery walks through the basics of using jQuery, the revolutionary JavaScript framework that makes writing client-side code fun and easy, and then dives into the details of writing AJAX enabled ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms applications. We will also cover popular plugins and extending jQuery in future episodes.

Today, the first video in that series is available: Getting Started with jQuery.

In this episode we cover the basics of getting started with jQuery. We start with a basic HTML page and show how to include jQuery, how to write your first code, and explain all of the moving pieces and how they work.

If you’ve been following my site and working with jQuery already, the first episode may sound elementary, but there’s going to be something for everyone before the series is finished. By the third episode, we’re already into topics like making AJAX calls to MVC controller actions and progressively enhancing an entry form with the jQuery form plugin.

I hope you’ll head over to TekPub, and have a look for yourself.

In my most recent post, I demonstrated a workaround to allow using the jQuery validation plugin with WebForms pages. The basic idea was to trigger validation only on submissions that occurred within a single logical form, instead of catching submissions anywhere on WebForms’ all-encompassing physical form.

This approach worked fine for a single logical form, but wasn’t robust enough when handling validation for multiple logical forms on a single page. Additionally, it did not properly handle the enter key, allowing users to (perhaps accidentally) slip past validation if they simply hit the enter key within a TextBox.

In this post, we will continue by refining the solution from last time. So, if you haven’t read the previous post, familiarize yourself with it first. Specifically, this post will cover how to implement an analogue of WebForms’ ValidationGroup, use that to independently validate multiple form regions, handle the enter key, and refactor the final solution to minimize duplicated code.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

You’ve probably noticed that Jörn Zaefferer’s jQuery validation plugin has been gaining momentum in the ASP.NET community lately. Between Microsoft’s implied endorsement via ASP.NET MVC 2.0 integration and the plugin’s recent inclusion on the Microsoft AJAX CDN, adoption is only increasing. Unfortunately for those who don’t or can’t use ASP.NET MVC yet, using the validation plugin within WebForms applications can be tricky.

Because the WebForms Postback model requires that the entire page be contained within a single form element, form submissions that shouldn’t trigger validation are likely. ASP.NET’s built-in validation controls solve this with ValidationGroups and the CausesValidation property, but that doesn’t help if you’d prefer to use the jQuery validation plugin.

However, there are a couple relatively easy workarounds that make it possible to use the jQuery validation plugin on WebForms pages, without re-architecting the page or its forms. In this post, I’ll show you why the WebForms page structure is a problem, how to make jQuery validation work with it, and an example of implementing those workarounds.

Note: I want to preface this by saying that you should never rely entirely on client-side validation. The jQuery validation plugin can be a great replacement for the client-side part of the ASP.NET Validators, but it is not a complete replacement on its own. Use responsibly!

Click here to read the rest of this post »