As jQuery’s popularity in the .NET community has risen over the past year, one recurring theme I’ve seen is the desire to refactor away the details of using it to call ASP.NET AJAX services. Whether through helper function or specialized jQuery plugin, I’ve seen numerous methods proposed and/or in use.

Personally, the syntax never bothered me. The contentType parameter is ugly, but I have a Visual Studio code snippet for the $.ajax call and rarely think about it.

That came to an end earlier this year, when I started using dataFilter. I needed to isolate my code from the “.d” issue, and wanted to take advantage of browser-native JSON parsing in Firefox 3.5 and IE8, which required a bulky dataFilter.

Repeating that entire callback function in every $.ajax call was not acceptable. So, I was happy to learn that jQuery provides an excellent solution for consolidating settings to be used in multiple instances of $.ajax.

In this post, I’ll show you how to use that consolidation feature, and exactly how I am now using that to more simply call ASP.NET AJAX services with jQuery.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

When you’re working with JSON, performance and security are often opposing, yet equally important concerns. One of these areas of contention is handling the JSON strings returned by a server. Most JavaScript libraries do a great job of abstracting away the details, but the underlying process has long been a frustrating exercise in compromise.

On one hand, eval() is the fastest widely available method, but it is not safe.

On the other hand, textual JSON parsers written in JavaScript may be much safer, but are dramatically slower. In client-side situations, where milliseconds count, such a large performance overhead is typically too prohibitive to accept.

Recently, an exciting new alternative has emerged: browser-native JSON parsing. Integrating JSON parsing as part of the browser’s implementation of JavaScript allows for using the more secure parsing method, and even provides performance faster than eval() offers.

To take advantage of that, this post will show you how to detect whether or not a browser supports native JSON parsing, and how to force jQuery to use browser-native parsing in its $.ajax calls when it is available.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

When I recently received this message from a frustrated reader:

After hours and hours of slamming my head into the desk it turns out it was the darn "d" in the response. My home computer is on .NET 2.0 and my work computer is on 3.5. Jimminie Christmas!

I realized that the “.d” introduced in ASP.NET AJAX 3.5’s JSON responses is still all too common a stumbling block when calling ASP.NET AJAX services through a library such as jQuery. In fact, with jQuery’s popularity among ASP.NET developers on the rise, this appears to have become an even more frequent problem.

Since a lot of people are having trouble with it, I want to share one method you can use to completely isolate your code from the problem. If you bake this into an $.ajax() code snippet or otherwise use it as a template for calling ASP.NET AJAX services in jQuery, you should never have to think or worry about the “.d” again.

In this post, I will show you how to detect the “.d” and how you can completely isolate your $.ajax success handler from it.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

As a longtime listener myself, I was eager when Craig asked me to come on the Polymorphic Podcast to talk about jQuery. I’ve always enjoyed how he doesn’t shy away from talking about HTML and JavaScript, which is still too uncommon in the .NET world.

With that in mind, I knew we’d be able to have a great conversation about jQuery and the concerns that ASP.NET developers run into when using it. I really enjoyed recording the show, and think it turned out pretty well. I hope you’ll enjoy it too:

Polymorphic Podcast: jQuery Secrets with Dave Ward

If you haven’t yet, I highly recommend subscribing to Craig’s podcast. There are some real gems in his previous shows too, so check those out as well.

As an ASP.NET developer working on the client-side, one problem you’ll encounter is how to reference the HTML elements that ASP.NET web controls generate. All too often, you find yourself wasting time trying to reference TextBox1, when the element is actually rendered as ctl00_panel1_wizard1_TextBox1.

Much has been written about this, including a post of my own, so I won’t go into detail about many of the workarounds. Instead, I want to take a closer look at the performance drawbacks of one popular solution: the [attribute$=value] selector.

By specifying id as the attribute in this selector, you can avoid ASP.NET’s ClientID issues completely. No matter what the framework prefixes your rendered elements with, they still “end with” the ID you specify at design time. This makes the “ends with” selector a convenient alternative to injecting a control’s ClientID property via angle-brackets.

However, are we trading performance for this convenience? If so, how much?

When Craig Shoemaker asked that question while interviewing me for an upcoming episode of Polymorphic Podcast, I realized I didn’t know the answer as clearly as I’d like. So, I decided to do a bit of benchmarking.

In this post, I’ll share the results of that benchmarking, and show you one way to significantly improve the performance of this convenient selector.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

As much as I enjoyed attending MIX09 this year, it wasn’t a difficult decision when Karsten asked me to write an article for the MIX Online site.

Reading this here, there’s a good chance the article is targeted below the amount of jQuery expertise you already have. However, it’s been brought to my attention that some readers have found it useful for sending to their more JavaScript-phobic coworkers.

So, I decided that it’s worth mentioning here after all:

It’s hard to believe that JavaScript is already well over a decade old. Often relegated to marginal tasks in its early years, JavaScript has grown to become a pillar of modern web development. With the current popularity of DHTML and AJAX, it can be difficult to find a site that doesn’t use JavaScript anymore. One of the driving forces behind JavaScript’s newfound popularity is a proliferation of JavaScript frameworks, such as jQuery.

 

Why?

Click here to continue reading this article on the MIX Online site »

The problem of how to handle dates in JSON is one of the more troublesome issues that may arise when directly calling ASP.NET AJAX web services and page methods.

Unlike every other data type in the language, JavaScript offers no declarative method for expressing a Date. Consequently, embedding them within JSON requires a bit of fancy footwork. Since the question of how I handle this problem is something asked often in emails and in comments on other posts here, I want to address the topic with its own post.

To that end, I will attempt to explain what exactly the problem is with dates in JSON, how ASP.NET AJAX solves it, and my alternative solution that I believe is easier and works just as well in most cases.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

So far, my examples of using jQuery to interact with ASP.NET AJAX services have avoided passing complex data to the server during the request. This has been intentional, because I didn’t want to over-complicate the examples.

For primarily read-only scenarios, like the RSS reader examples, passing just a few simple values to the service is often all you need. However, this scalar approach quickly becomes untenable when making real-world service calls.

In this post, I’m going to show you how passing complex types to the server helps alleviate complexity, how json2.js and a data transfer object (DTO) facilitates this, and how to use jQuery to very easily build the DTO.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

Recently, I’ve attended several presentations in which ASP.NET AJAX’s pageLoad() shortcut is demonstrated as interchangeable with jQuery’s $(document).ready() event. The suggestion that both methods are equivalent actually appears to be true in simple demos, but is not the case and is certain to lead to later confusion.

While they seem similar on the surface, $(document).ready() and pageLoad() are very different behind the scenes. Determining the earliest point that it’s safe to modify the DOM requires a bit of black magic, and the two libraries approach that in their own unique ways. Additionally, pageLoad() is overloaded with some extra functionality which may surprise you.

In this post, I’ll clarify the major differences between jQuery and ASP.NET AJAX’s initialization functions, what implications those difference have in practice, and show you a third alternative when working with ASP.NET AJAX.

Click here to read the rest of this post »

If you don’t properly handle the inevitable errors in your web applications, you can expect your users to eventually react about like this guy. Since they typically squelch any server-side errors, AJAX service calls are especially problematic. In fact, they rarely even throw a client-side error when they fail.

Even when a client-side error is thrown, most users won’t notice it and the ones who do notice won’t know what the error means or what to do next. In fact, I’ve found that even many developers don’t notice client-side scripting errors that occur while they’re debugging their own applications!

To help you remedy this problem in your own applications, I want to show you one way that I handle AJAX service call errors with jQuery. To do this, we will build an error-prone web service, make an AJAX request to it via jQuery, handle the resulting server-side errors gracefully, and use a jQuery plugin to attractively present those errors.

Click here to read the rest of this post »